Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 19 de 19
Filter
1.
Healthcare (Basel) ; 11(6)2023 Mar 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2258113

ABSTRACT

Using face masks appropriately is important for preventing the community spread of respiratory infections. A cross-sectional study was conducted to evaluate the knowledge level and experience of using face masks between healthcare teams to protect them and limit the spread of COVID-19 infection. A structured questionnaire was distributed to 228 healthcare members in July-December 2021. It was divided into two sections and consisted of 29 questions for a total possible score of 0 to 29. The first section was related to perceptions and knowledge about face masks (13 items); the second was related to the experience of using face masks (16 items). The average score of this questionnaire was 23.21/29 with respect to the knowledge about face masks and their proper use techniques. The healthcare team studied had satisfactory knowledge about face mask use techniques, and the study shed light on their unsatisfactory practices. Following instructions is very vital to protecting the person wearing the mask and preventing the spread of infection during health care by blocking droplets produced by speaking or coughing. Providing the healthcare teams with knowledge and experience about how to use face masks during the pandemic is critical to increase their awareness and practice in using face masks and prevent the infection from spreading.

2.
J Pers Med ; 12(11)2022 Nov 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2099620

ABSTRACT

Patients with neurological comorbidities are more likely to develop severe COVID-19. We aimed to detect the outcomes of COVID-19 patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage comorbidity and the role of enoxaparin in decreasing the mortality rate in these cases, even though enoxaparin is a potential cause of intracerebral hemorrhage. The patients were checked on to detect surveillance outcomes, the relationship between mortality and patient characteristics, and the relationship between enoxaparin and study outcomes. Chest condition and GCS improved in 67.9% of participants. Hematoma course increased in 49.1%. Midline-shift, brain-edema, and COVID symptoms improved in 67.9%. There was a non-significant difference in mortality regarding age and gender. There was a significant difference in mortality regarding treatment with enoxaparin; 75% of the patients who did not receive enoxaparin died. 92.6% of the patients who showed decreases in hematoma course were administered enoxaparin. 76.9% of the patients who showed increases in hematoma-course were administered enoxaparin. Most of the patients who were admitted to the neurosurgical unit with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage acquired the COVID-19 infection. Most of the cases included in this study did not progress to severe cases. The dying patients showed deterioration in both neurological and COVID-19 symptoms. The anticoagulant properties of enoxaparin given earlier before and throughout the infection can considerably reduce mortality in COVID-19 individuals with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. It is recommended to use enoxaparin for cases with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage and COVID-19 regardless of hematoma size because the rate of improvement was greater than the mortality rate after using enoxaparin in this study.

3.
Int J Clin Pract ; 75(4): e13908, 2021 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2052531

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Vitamin D deficiency in children is related to the augmented risk of bone illnesses, but its effect on critically ill children is still conflicting. This meta-analysis study was performed to assess the relationship between vitamin D deficiency in children and sepsis, paediatric risk of mortality III score, need for ventilation support, length of hospital stay, and duration of mechanical ventilation in critically ill children. METHODS: Through a systematic literature search up to June 2020, 16 studies with 2382 children, 1229 children of them with vitamin D deficiency, were found recording relationships between vitamin D deficiency and sepsis, paediatric risk of mortality III score, need for ventilation support, length of hospital stay, and/or duration of mechanical ventilation. Odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was calculated between vitamin D deficiency children to non-vitamin D deficiency children on the different outcomes in critically ill children using the dichotomous or continuous methods with a random or fixed-effect model. RESULTS: The vitamin D deficiency children category had significantly higher sepsis (OR, 2.35; 95% CI, 1.19-4.63, P = .01); paediatric risk of mortality III score (OR, 2.19; 95% CI, 1.13-4.25, P = .02); higher length of hospital stay (OR, 4.26; 95% CI, 0.81-7.70, P = .02); higher duration of mechanical ventilation (OR, 1.89; 95% CI, 0.22-3.56, P = .03) compared with that in the non-vitamin D deficiency children. However, the need for ventilation support in vitamin D deficiency children did not significantly differ from non-vitamin D deficiency children (OR, 2.00; 95% CI, 0.98-4.07, P = .06) with relatively higher results in vitamin D deficiency children. CONCLUSIONS: Vitamin D deficiency in children might have an independent relationship with higher sepsis, paediatric risk of mortality III score, length of hospital stay, and duration of mechanical ventilation. The relation was relative with a higher risk in need for ventilation support with vitamin D deficiency children. This relationship encouraged us to recommend testing vitamin D levels in all critically ill children and providing them with supplemental vitamin D as prophylaxis.


Subject(s)
Sepsis , Vitamin D Deficiency , Child , Critical Illness , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Length of Stay , Respiration, Artificial , Vitamin D , Vitamin D Deficiency/complications
4.
Beni Suef Univ J Basic Appl Sci ; 11(1): 57, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1854889

ABSTRACT

Background: Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP), BiPhasic Positive Airway Pressure (BiPAP), and high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) show some evidence to have efficacy in COVID-19 patients. Delivery during noninvasive mechanical ventilation (NIV) or HFNC gives faster and more enhanced clinical effects than when aerosols are given without assisted breath. The present work aimed to compare the effect of BiPhasic Positive Airway Pressure (BiPAP) mode at two different pressures; low BiPAP (Inspiratory Positive Airway Pressure (IPAP)/Expiratory Positive Airway Pressure (EPAP) of 10/5 cm water) and high BiPAP (IPAP/EPAP of 20/5 cm water), with HFNC system on pulmonary and systemic drug delivery of salbutamol. On the first day of the experiment, all patients received 2500 µg salbutamol using Aerogen Solo vibrating mesh nebulizer. Urine samples 30 min post-dose and cumulative urinary salbutamol during the next 24 h were collected on the next day. On the third day, the ex-vivo filter was inserted before the patient to collect the delivered dose to the patient of the 2500 µg salbutamol. Salbutamol was quantified using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Results: Low-pressure BiPAP showed the highest amount delivered to the lung after 30 min followed by HFNC then high-pressure BiPAP. But the significant difference was only observed between low and high-pressure BiPAP modes (p = 0.012). Low-pressure BiPAP showed the highest delivered systemic delivery amount followed by HFNC then high-pressure BiPAP. Low-pressure BiPAP was significantly higher than HFNC (p = 0.017) and high-pressure BiPAP (p = 0.008). No significant difference was reported between HFNC and high-pressure BiPAP. The ex-vivo filter was the greatest in the case of low-pressure BiPAP followed by HFNC then high-pressure BiPAP. Low-pressure BiPAP was significantly higher than HFNC (p = 0.033) and high-pressure BiPAP (p = 0.008). Also, no significant difference was found between HFNC and high-pressure BiPAP. Conclusions: Our results of pulmonary, systemic, and ex-vivo drug delivery were found to be consistent. The low BiPAP delivered the highest amount followed by the HFNC then the high BiPAP with the least amount. However, no significant difference was found between HFNC and high BiPAP.

5.
Vaccines (Basel) ; 10(1)2021 Dec 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1580360

ABSTRACT

Vaccines are the solution to overcome SARS-CoV-2. This study aimed to determine the post-Sinopharm vaccine safety-profile and immunity through antibody titers. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire from Egyptian participants who received two doses of Sinopharm vaccine. Data were divided into three parts, the first and second parts were to detect participants' post-first and second dose symptoms and practices, and the third for the results of IgG anti spike protein antibodies test and laboratory tests. Pain, redness, swelling at the injection site, headache, fatigue, and lethargy were the most common post-vaccine symptoms for both first and second doses. Most of the participants felt mild or no symptoms after vaccination. The symptoms started mostly during the first day post-vaccination and lasted for no more than two days. Forty-nine percent of the participants resulted in positive antibodies tests on day 18 post-vaccination. The average antibody level for vaccinated participants with past SARS-CoV-2 infection was much higher than that for non-past infected participants. These vaccines' administration methods need to be reevaluated by changing the dose, dose interval, adding a third dose, or mixing it with other vaccines with different techniques to improve their protection rates. Further studies are required to validate this finding.

6.
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) ; 23(4): 264-271, 2022 04 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1562166

ABSTRACT

AIMS: To estimate if chronic anticoagulant (CAC) treatment is associated with morbidity and mortality outcomes of patients hospitalized for SARS-CoV-2 infection. METHODS: In this European multicentric cohort study, we included 1186 patients of whom 144 were on CAC (12.1%) with positive coronavirus disease 2019 testing between 1 February and 30 July 2020. The average treatment effect (ATE) analysis with a propensity score-matching (PSM) algorithm was used to estimate the impact of CAC on the primary outcomes defined as in-hospital death, major and minor bleeding events, cardiovascular complications (CCI), and acute kidney injury (AKI). We also investigated if different dosages of in-hospital heparin were associated with in-hospital survival. RESULTS: In unadjusted populations, primary outcomes were significantly higher among CAC patients compared with non-CAC patients: all-cause death (35% vs. 18% P < 0.001), major and minor bleeding (14% vs. 8% P = 0.026; 25% vs. 17% P = 0.014), CCI (27% vs. 14% P < 0.001), and AKI (42% vs. 19% P < 0.001). In ATE analysis with PSM, there was no significant association between CAC and primary outcomes except for an increased incidence of AKI (ATE +10.2%, 95% confidence interval 0.3-20.1%, P = 0.044). Conversely, in-hospital heparin, regardless of dose, was associated with a significantly higher survival compared with no anticoagulation. CONCLUSIONS: The use of CAC was not associated with the primary outcomes except for the increase in AKI. However, in the adjusted survival analysis, any dose of in-hospital anticoagulation was associated with significantly higher survival compared with no anticoagulation.


Subject(s)
Acute Kidney Injury , COVID-19 , Acute Kidney Injury/chemically induced , Acute Kidney Injury/epidemiology , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19 Testing , Cohort Studies , Hospital Mortality , Hospitals , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2
7.
J Med Virol ; 93(12): 6535-6543, 2021 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1544301

ABSTRACT

Measurement of the population's general knowledge of the coronavirus vaccine is very important to improve public acceptance and decrease vaccine hesitancy in confronting the disease. This study aimed to evaluate the knowledge, attitude, and practices of the participants towards the coronavirus vaccine. Data were collected using an online survey, in the form of a structured questionnaire, conducted during April-May 2021 in Egypt, and subjects from all over Egypt participated. The questionnaire was divided into three parts to assess the knowledge and attitude regarding coronavirus. The first part was to assess participants' experience about coronavirus infection (eight items), the second was to assess the health beliefs about coronavirus and vaccine (16 items) and the third was to assess general knowledge, attitude, and practices of the participants towards vaccine (28 items). A total of 871 (465 females) participants participated, 81% of them were still committed to the precautionary measures for protection. Eighty-eight percent of them accepted to take the vaccine. Eighty-three percent of the participants answered that they will encourage family, friends, and colleagues to get the vaccine. Ninety-four percent knew that the coronavirus vaccine provides immunity against infection for a period of 6-12 months. 91.9% believed that the current infection with coronavirus is one of the main contraindications to vaccination. Eighty-nine percent believed that both pregnant women and chronic disease patients can get vaccinated and also that there is no specific age for a specific type of vaccination. Ninety-four percent of them knew that subjects taking immunosuppressive drugs should be prescribed Sinopharm, not AstraZeneca vaccine. The median score of this survey was 20/22 regarding knowledge about the coronavirus vaccine. Overall, the study participants had good knowledge about the coronavirus vaccine and accepted to take the vaccine, which indicates the highly commendable efforts to confront the coronavirus.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines/therapeutic use , COVID-19/prevention & control , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Vaccination Refusal/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Egypt , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Vaccination Refusal/psychology , Young Adult
8.
Beni Suef Univ J Basic Appl Sci ; 10(1): 71, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1502033

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a viral disease that causes a respiratory disorder, started in December of 2019 in China. Several vitamins and trace elements could help in enhancing host immunity producing antioxidant or anti-inflammatory action. This work aimed to identify the role of different nutrition, vitamins, and trace elements on the immunity status of the infected subject and the possibility of the beneficial role of these elements in the management of COVID-19. MAIN BODY: After collecting (PubMed, scholar, OVID, Embase, Cochrane Library) and investigating published articles, testing the effect of these elements on viral infection, it was found that most of these elements have a significant role during viral infection through a different mechanism, like antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and immunomodulation. Nutritional interventions in COVID-19 infections are very important currently, and it was reported that vitamin C and D reduce the risk of acute respiratory infections. In addition, low vitamin A diets compromise the effectiveness of inactivated bovine coronavirus vaccines. Administration of N-acetyl cysteine showed a beneficial inhibitory effect in viral infections and enhanced glutathione production. The deficiency of selenium on COVID-19 subjects has a significant impact on the clinical outcome of the subjects. In addition, supplementation with vitamins proved to enhance immune response during viral infection. Vitamins and trace elements not only showed a beneficial effect but also Omega 3 fatty acids showed an immunomodulating effect during infections. SHORT CONCLUSIONS: Assessment of levels for these trace elements at the baseline and providing supplementation containing different vitamins and elements could result in better control and clinical outcomes in the case of COVID-19.

9.
J Med Virol ; 94(1): 197-204, 2022 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1370369

ABSTRACT

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has had different waves within the same country. The spread rate and severity showed different properties within the COVID-19 different waves. The present work aims to compare the spread and the severity of the different waves using the available data of confirmed COVID-19 cases and death cases. Real-data sets collected from the Johns Hopkins University Center for Systems Science were used to perform a comparative study between COVID-19 different waves in 12 countries with the highest total performed tests for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 detection in the world (Italy, Brazil, Japan, Germany, Spain, India, USA, UAE, Poland, Colombia, Turkey, and Switzerland). The total number of confirmed cases and death cases in different waves of COVID-19 were compared to that of the previous one for equivalent periods. The total number of death cases in each wave was presented as a percentage of the total number of confirmed cases for the same periods. In all the selected 12 countries, Wave 2 had a much higher number of confirmed cases than that in Wave 1. However, the death cases increase was not comparable with that of the confirmed cases to the extent that some countries had lower death cases than in Wave 1, UAE, and Spain. The death cases as a percentage of the total number of confirmed cases in Wave 1 were much higher than that in Wave 2. Some countries have had Waves 3 and 4. Waves 3 and 4 have had lower confirmed cases than Wave 2, however, the death cases were variable in different countries. The death cases in Waves 3 and 4 were similar to or higher than Wave 2 in most countries. Wave 2 of COVID-19 had a much higher spread rate but much lower severity resulting in a lower death rate in Wave 2 compared with that of the first wave. Waves 3 and 4 have had lower confirmed cases than Wave 2; that could be due to the presence of appropriate treatment and vaccination. However, that was not reflected in the death cases, which were similar to or higher than Wave 2 in most countries. Further studies are needed to explain these findings.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , Asia/epidemiology , COVID-19/mortality , COVID-19/transmission , COVID-19/virology , Europe/epidemiology , Global Health , Humans , Mutation , Severity of Illness Index , South America/epidemiology , United States/epidemiology
10.
Int J Clin Pract ; 75(10): e14694, 2021 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1334471

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to develop a model evaluating the role of repeating quarantine instructions and healthy practices among COVID-19 patients and contact persons at-home quarantine and to evaluate the instructions' adequacy in decreasing the rate of disease spread with better clinical outcomes. METHODS: A structured questionnaire was distributed to COVID-19 patients (mild and moderate cases isolated at home) and contacting persons during May and June 2020. Data were collected using a structured online survey collected every five days for three times from each participant. The questionnaire was divided into three sections, consisting of 35 questions for a total possible score of 0 to 35. RESULTS: A total of 150 valid participant's responses out of 304 participants were obtained. Among the150 total participants, 88 were infected with COVID-19, and 62 were contacting with COVID-19 patients. The improvement in the score of awareness and adherence to instructions for the infected patients and their contacts was significantly high in the third questionnaire than in the second and the first questionnaire. The people who live in cities followed the instructions provided at the home quarantine better than those who live in the country. The city patients improved in symptoms better than the country patients. Also, patients followed the instructions better than their contacts. City females adhered to the instructions better than city males. Young people had high awareness score than older people. City people are committed to taking both immune boosters supplements as prophylaxis or prescribed medications on time for treatment more than country people. CONCLUSION: This study offers useful insights into factors associated with the role of repeating quarantine instructions and healthy practices to overcome the COVID-19 pandemic. So, repeating the instructions is important to increase adherence to the instructions, decrease the rate of disease progression and decrease the spread of the infection.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Quarantine , Adolescent , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Surveys and Questionnaires
11.
Int J Clin Pract ; 75(10): e14640, 2021 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1325002

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Clinical symptoms of adults and paediatric inpatients with COVID-19 disease are conflicting. This meta-analysis was conducted to assess the effect of age of COVID-19 inpatient on the severity of the disease. METHODS: A systematic literature search up to January 2021 was performed and 5 studies included 910 inpatients with COVID-19 disease at the baseline of the study; 773 of them were adult inpatients, and 137 of them were paediatric inpatients. They reported a comparison between adults and children with COVID-19 in the level of symptomatic severity, clinical features, computed tomography (CT) results and laboratory results. Odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated assessing the effect of age of COVID-19 inpatient on the severity of the disease using the dichotomous method with a random or fixed-effect model. RESULTS: Adults with COVID-19 disease had significantly lower number of mild cases (OR, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.04-0.77, P = .02); higher number severe cases (OR, 4.90; 95% CI, 2.03-11.83, P < .001); higher number of cases with fever (OR, 4.14; 95% CI, 2.31-7.43, P < .001); and higher number of cases with CT positive COVID-19 disease (OR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.17-3.55, P = .001) compared with children. However, no significant difference was found between adults and children in number of cases with shortness of breath (OR, 1.44; 95% CI, 0.41-5.04, P = .57); dry cough (OR, 1.77; 95% CI, 0.64-4.93, P = .27); leukopenia (OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.47-1.66, P = .71); lymphopenia (OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.49-1.88, P = .91); high platelets (OR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.17-1.02, P = .05); and high D-dimer (OR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.43-1.56, P = .54). CONCLUSIONS: Adults with COVID-19 disease have a much higher level of symptomatic severity, fever and CT-positive COVID-19 disease than children. However, as shown in our results, the laboratory data were similar in both groups.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Inpatients , Adult , Child , Cough , Fever , Humans , SARS-CoV-2
12.
Int J Clin Pract ; 75(6): e14116, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1105280

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUNDS: SARS-CoV-2 is affecting different countries all over the world, with significant variation in infection-rate and death-ratio. We have previously shown a presence of a possible relationship between different variables including the Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccine, average age, gender, and malaria treatment, and the rate of spread, severity and mortality of COVID-19 disease. This paper focuses on developing machine learning models for this relationship. METHODS: We have used real-datasets collected from the Johns Hopkins University Center for Systems Science and Engineering and the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control to develop a model from China data as the baseline country. From this model, we predicted and forecasted different countries' daily confirmed-cases and daily death-cases and examined if there was any possible effect of the variables mentioned above. RESULTS: The model was trained based on China data as a baseline model for daily confirmed-cases and daily death-cases. This machine learning application succeeded in modelling and forecasting daily confirmed-cases and daily death-cases. The modelling and forecasting of viral spread resulted in four different regions; these regions were dependent on the malarial treatments, BCG vaccination, weather conditions, and average age. However, the lack of social distancing resulted in variation in the effect of these factors, for example, double-humped spread and mortality cases curves and sudden increases in the spread and mortality cases in different countries. The process of machine learning for time-series prediction and forecasting, especially in the pandemic COVID-19 domain, proved usefulness in modelling and forecasting the end status of the virus spreading based on specific regional and health support variables. CONCLUSION: From the experimental results, we confirm that COVID-19 has a very low spread in the African countries with all the four variables (average young age, hot weather, BCG vaccine and malaria treatment); a very high spread in European countries and the USA with no variable (old people, cold weather, no BCG vaccine and no malaria). The effect of the variables could be on the spread or the severity to the extent that the infected subject might not have symptoms or the case is mild and can be missed as a confirmed-case. Social distancing decreases the effect of these factors.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Africa , China , Europe , Humans , Machine Learning , Physical Distancing , SARS-CoV-2
13.
Int J Clin Pract ; 75(5): e13981, 2021 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1041386

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The OM-85 (Broncho-Vaxom) consumption has drawn considerable attention in the prevention of recurrent respiratory tract infections. However, it has been reported that the relationship between OM-85 consumption and recurrent respiratory tract infections is variable. This meta-analysis was performed to evaluate this relationship. METHODS: A systematic literature search up-to May 2020 was performed and 14 studies were detected with 1859 paediatric subjects, of them 890 consumed OM-85. They were reporting relationships between OM-85 consumption and recurrent respiratory tract infections. Odds ratio (OR) or mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was calculated to evaluate the prognostic role of OM-85 consumption and recurrent respiratory tract infections using the dichotomous or continuous method with a random or fixed-effect model. RESULTS: OM-85 consumption was significantly related to lower frequency of respiratory tract infections (MD, -1.16; 95% CI, -1.66 to -0.65, P < .001); lower total duration of respiratory tract infections (MD, -19.51; 95% CI, -23.00 to -16.01, P < .001); lower incidence of respiratory tract infections (OR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.21-0.77, P = .006); lower number of antibiotic courses (MD, -1.40; 95% CI, -2.63 to 0.17, P = .03); and lower antibiotic use (OR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.29-0.52, P < .001). However, OM-85 consumption was not significantly related to adverse event rate (OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.52-2.03, P = .94); or to wheezing attacks frequency (MD, -0.25; 95% CI, -0.59 to 0.08, P = .14). CONCLUSIONS: The impact of OM-85 consumption on recurrent respiratory tract infections may have a great effect as a tool to improve subjects' immunity against recurrent respiratory tract infections, which could be helpful in crucial situations, eg, COVID-19 pandemic. OM-85 non-consumers had an independent risk relationship with recurrent respiratory tract infections. This relationship forces us to recommend OM-85 consumption with those with a high risk of recurrent respiratory tract infections to avoid any possible complications.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Respiratory Tract Infections , Adjuvants, Immunologic , Child , Humans , Pandemics , Respiratory Tract Infections/drug therapy , Respiratory Tract Infections/epidemiology , Respiratory Tract Infections/prevention & control , SARS-CoV-2
14.
Int J Clin Pract ; 75(4): e13877, 2021 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-969186

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The repurposing of nitazoxanide, doxycycline and azithromycin may be effective to improve the symptoms in mild and moderate COVID-19 subjects. This study aimed to detect and explain the efficacy of reusing of these drugs in treating COVID-19. METHODS: The study was divided into two parts: clinical and computational parts. In the clinical part, 80 (30 females) subjects with reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction-confirmed COVID-19 with mild and moderate symptoms were enrolled in the study. Subjects were treated with azithromycin or doxycycline, and nitazoxanide was added to the treatment if the subject had diarrhoea. Subjects were divided into four groups: Group 1: subjects treated with azithromycin (20 subjects); Group 2: subjects treated with doxycycline (20 subjects); Group 3: subjects treated with a combination of nitazoxanide and doxycycline (20 subjects); and Group 4: subjects treated with a combination of nitazoxanide and azithromycin (20 subjects). In the computational part, we docked the three drugs against all currently available COVID-19-related protein targets (viral and non-viral). Subsequently, top hits were subjected to molecular dynamic simulations (MDSs) (50 ns) and binding free energy calculations to further validate the docking experiments and to investigate the binding modes of the potential inhibitors. RESULTS: The symptomatic improvement of mild to moderate subjects was seen on the fifth day after starting treatment in Group 3 and Group 4 and on the seventh day in Group 2. However, for Group 1, the symptomatic improvement of mild to moderate subjects was not seen on the fifth day and required replacement by doxycycline to get the symptomatic improvement. None of the subjects needed intensive care admission and no deaths were reported. In silico, results were in good accordance with the clinical outcomes, where both nitazoxanide and doxycycline achieved the best docking scores against the viral ADP-ribose phosphatase (ADPRP) and the human Adaptor-Associated Kinase 1 (AAK1). MDSs revealed that both drugs were stable in their bindings indicating that they can be considered as lead molecules for targeting ADPRP and AAK1. CONCLUSION: The clinical and computational studies applied on three FDA-approved antimicrobials together with their recent clinical findings revealed that both nitazoxanide and doxycycline have great therapeutic potential against COVID-19. The future in vitro mechanistic investigation may confirm our primary computational outcomes, and in turn, these classes of compounds provide a promising starting point for further anti-COVID-19 therapeutics.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Drug Repositioning , Pharmaceutical Preparations , Adolescent , Computer Simulation , Female , Humans , Lactation , Male , SARS-CoV-2
15.
Int J Clin Pract ; 75(5): e13886, 2021 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-957841

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The new coronavirus (SARS-COV-2) that emerged at the end of 2019 was stated in China and infected millions of people around the world, with the highest spread rate amongst humans compared with other coronaviruses. This paper aimed to review and analyse the published studies about COVID-19 diagnosis, prevention, and treatment. METHOD: The reviewed studies were clinical trials, in-vivo, in-vitro, guidelines, reports from the world health organization (WHO), and the centre for disease control and prevention (CDC) in addition to systemic reviews. All data extracted and analysed to stand on the latest updates and recommendations for fighting this severe attack of COVID-19. RESULTS: Most important antiviral therapy of COVID-19 clinical trials is still running without clear results, but a few trials have indicated the role of numerous drugs in the treatment of COVID-19. Specific recommendations for aerosol therapy should be followed for the management of COVID-19. CONCLUSION: Nature of COVID-19 is still not very clear, however, management of the condition is similar to the previous attacks of coronaviruses.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections , COVID-19 Testing , China , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Coronavirus Infections/drug therapy , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Humans , SARS-CoV-2
16.
Int J Clin Pract ; 75(4): e13810, 2021 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-894764

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: One of the keys elements to control the transmission of COVID-19 is to decrease the source of infection and transmission to the community. Following the instructions is very important to achieve that. This study aimed to evaluate awareness and practices related to the COVID-19 quarantine instructions among the home quarantine COVID-19 patients, and persons who contacted them at home quarantine. METHODS: During May and June 2020, the home quarantine COVID-19 patients (mild and moderate cases who need not be admitted to hospital) and the contacting persons were asked to fill an online structured questionnaire. Data were collected to assess the awareness regarding the quarantine instructions. The questionnaire was divided into three sections, consisting of 35 questions for a total possible score of 0-35. The first section was to assess the participants' awareness [19 items]; the second was to assess the awareness of the participants' families [11 items]; the third was to assessing awareness and attitude regarding the efforts provided to face COVID-19 [5 items]. RESULTS: A total of 300 subjects participated, 96% of them were committed not to leave the house till the end of the self-isolation period; 85% cared for house cleanliness and good ventilation of rooms; 63% maintained a balanced diet without fats, oil, and sugar; 70% used vitamins D and A to strengthen the immune system. The important role of the media in informing subjects of COVID-19 was known by 90%, while 63% of the participants are not satisfied with the hospital services in the area where they live. The average score of this questionnaire was 28.18/35 (80.5%) about the awareness of COVID-19 quarantine instructions. CONCLUSION: Home quarantined COVID-19 patients and people in close contact with them in the study had a good awareness of the home quarantine instructions. They had good knowledge about the home quarantine instructions; instructions for family members of infected patients; and awareness and attitude of the efforts provided to counter COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Quarantine , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Hospitalization , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , Surveys and Questionnaires
18.
Patient Educ Couns ; 2020 Sep 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-747887

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate public awareness in Egypt related to the coronavirus. METHODS: An online structured survey was conducted during March and April 2020 to assess coronavirus knowledge. The questionnaire was divided into 6 parts consisting of 39 questions for a total possible score of 0 to 39; to assess the participants' general knowledge [10 items]; symptoms knowledge [2 items]; transmission knowledge [6 items]; preventive knowledge [4 items]; treatment knowledge [6 items], and public knowledge of governmental and international efforts [10 items]. RESULTS: A total of 726 participants participated, 97.5% of them knew the main clinical symptoms of coronaviruses. 99% believed that following the etiquette of coughing, sneezing, or wearing a medical mask is important to reduce infection transmission. 80.5% of the participants believed that there is no effective treatment or vaccine available for the coronavirus. The important role of the international organizations to overcome the coronavirus was known by (92.3%). 65.2% believed that the Ministry of Health provided reliable data on the number of infections or death. 27.9% of the participants consider coronavirus infection as a stigma. The average score of this survey was 31.75/39 (81.4%) regarding the knowledge about the disease. CONCLUSION: Overall, the study participants' had good knowledge of coronavirus and the international efforts to confront the coronavirus. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Further study is required to evaluate the effect of such good knowledge on decreasing the infection rate.

19.
Vaccine ; 38(35): 5564-5568, 2020 07 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-650590

ABSTRACT

COVID-19 is affecting different countries all over the world with great variation in infection rate and death ratio. Some reports suggested a relation between the Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccine and the malaria treatment to the prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Some reports related infant's lower susceptibility to the COVID-19. Some other reports a higher risk in males compared to females in such COVID-19 pandemic. Also, some other reports claimed the possible use of chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine as prophylactic in such a pandemic. The present commentary is to discuss the possible relation between those factors and SARS-CoV-2 infection.


Subject(s)
Aging , BCG Vaccine/immunology , Chemoprevention , Chloroquine/pharmacology , Coronavirus Infections/mortality , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Hydroxychloroquine/pharmacology , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/mortality , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Sex Characteristics , Antiviral Agents/pharmacology , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , COVID-19 , Chloroquine/therapeutic use , Coronavirus Infections/immunology , Coronavirus Infections/transmission , Disease Susceptibility/immunology , Female , Geographic Mapping , Humans , Hydroxychloroquine/therapeutic use , Infant , Internationality , Male , Pneumonia, Viral/immunology , Pneumonia, Viral/transmission
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL